hey, it's noah

Month

September 2010

10 posts

“The only interesting people are on the West Coast,” —

Nick Denton, The Demon Blogger of Fleet Street

Strange timing on that comment. 

(via rickwebb)

Rafer sez:
Nope, just Denton’s S.O.P. disinformation activities. He regularly gets other pubs to print BS, which both confuses his competition and makes those other pubs look silly.

(via rafer)

Someone is right about this.

(via gross)

Noah’s two cents: Maybe I’m missing some joke, but I believe it was in reference to media people and specifically the old guard. It’s followed by, “People used to quake when Barry Diller picked up the phone. Now he’s laughable. That image of Murdoch dyeing his hair in the sink is indelible—though the coloring may not be. Sumner Redstone would only be of interest to Gawker readers if he were to soil his adult diapers—on-camera. But the hard truth is that the golden age of New York media is largely over.”

Sep 28, 20106 notes
“Northwestern professor Alok Choudhary and graduate student Ramanathan Narayanan say that if a celebrity tweets about his or her area of expertise, he or she may actually have some influence in that case — for example, if LeBron James tweets about basketball. But an actor’s political statements generally won’t hold as much weight as those tweeted by political analysts or politicians.” —

Ah, back to the reach vs. influence debate. 

Ashton Kutcher Has Little Twitter Influence [STUDY]

Sep 27, 20106 notes
Sep 23, 201017 notes
Sep 13, 20109 notes
“That’s what will always stick out in my mind about that day three years ago: the image of walking up Third Avenue to Grand Central with blue sky ahead of me and grey sky behind me.” —

Looking back at a post I wrote on this day six years ago about this day nine years ago.

Thinking About September 11th // NoahBrier.com

Sep 11, 20104 notes
Greeks, Bonds and Michael Lewis → noahbrier.com

Maybe I should just make this site a Michael Lewis fan page and be done with, but I can’t help but point to his new Vanity Fair piece on the Greek financial crisis. As usual he deftly explains what most every other journalist glossed over, assuming that I, as the reader, already understood (which maybe I should have).

My favorite bit probably comes at the beginning of the whole piece:

The tsunami of cheap credit that rolled across the planet between 2002 and 2007 has just now created a new opportunity for travel: financial-disaster tourism. The credit wasn’t just money, it was temptation. It offered entire societies the chance to reveal aspects of their characters they could not normally afford to indulge. Entire countries were told, “The lights are out, you can do whatever you want to do and no one will ever know.” What they wanted to do with money in the dark varied. Americans wanted to own homes far larger than they could afford, and to allow the strong to exploit the weak. Icelanders wanted to stop fishing and become investment bankers, and to allow their alpha males to reveal a theretofore suppressed megalomania. The Germans wanted to be even more German; the Irish wanted to stop being Irish. All these different societies were touched by the same event, but each responded to it in its own peculiar way.

A few paragraphs later he pays it off by explaining the Greek approach: “As it turned out, what the Greeks wanted to do, once the lights went out and they were alone in the dark with a pile of borrowed money, was turn their government into a piñata stuffed with fantastic sums and give as many citizens as possible a whack at it.”

As a side note, while I was on my honeymoon I met a Greek man who had left the country a while ago, first living in the US and now in Switzerland. He explained to me that no one in Greece paid taxes. Like no one. Ever. Which I didn’t quite believe until I read this and saw the some quotes that were almost word for word conversations he and I had in France in June.

Via: Greeks, Bonds and Michael Lewis // NoahBrier.com

Sep 11, 20105 notes
Sep 10, 20106 notes
Play
Sep 9, 201014 notes
Purposeful Obfuscation → noahbrier.com

I keep telling people about this one passage in The Big Short

(which is totally awesome and very worth reading if you want to have a better understanding of why we’re in the financial state we’re in). Anyway, it’s actually a footnote to the following quote from John Mack from Morgan Stanley (in response to an analyst asking how in the world they let one desk lose $8 billion):

Bill, look, let’s be clear. One, this trade was recognized and entered into our accounts. Two, it was entered into our risk management system. It’s very simple. when these got, it’s simple, it’s very painful, so I’m not being glib. When these guys stress loss the scenario on putting on this position, they did not envision…we could have this degree of default, right. It is fair to say that our risk management division did not stress those losses as well. It’s just simple as that. Those are big fat tail risks that caught us hard, right. That’s what happened.

The quote is nothing special. It’s confusing and obtuse, but otherwise unremarkable. Which is exactly the point Michael Lewis makes in his footnote: “It’s too much to expect the people who run big Wall Street firms to speak plain English, since so much of their livelihood depends on people believing that what they do cannot be translated into plain English.”

Since reading that I’ve been thinking about a bunch of different industries that fit that bill. Law seems like an obvious one: If we all believed we should be able to read and understand legal documents there would be a lot less money spent on lawyers. Not sure what I have a bigger point than that, but seemed worth sharing.

Via: Purposeful Obfuscation // NoahBrier.com

Sep 7, 20103 notes
Sep 3, 201033 notes
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 37
  • February 9
  • March 5
  • April 13
  • May 11
  • June 7
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 27
  • February 12
  • March 24
  • April 10
  • May 24
  • June 24
  • July 12
  • August 3
  • September 33
  • October 23
  • November 30
  • December 32
2010 2011 2012
  • January 22
  • February 29
  • March 22
  • April 21
  • May 5
  • June 12
  • July 4
  • August 3
  • September 8
  • October 30
  • November 12
  • December 20
2009 2010 2011
  • January 91
  • February 41
  • March 23
  • April 38
  • May 40
  • June 16
  • July 31
  • August 10
  • September 10
  • October 6
  • November 18
  • December 9
2008 2009 2010
  • January
  • February 42
  • March 83
  • April 137
  • May 148
  • June 110
  • July 80
  • August 157
  • September 76
  • October 66
  • November 98
  • December 67
2007 2008 2009
  • January 1
  • February 2
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2007 2008
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November 22
  • December 6